Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
Two of the most-asked-about agents in the coding space. Here's how they actually stack up.
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant that uses Sourcegraph's code graph for monorepo-scale context
Free + $9/mo
Read full review →Cursor
AI-first code editor built on top of VS Code
Free + $20/mo
Read full review →Side-by-side comparison
| Sourcegraph Cody | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI coding assistant that uses Sourcegraph's code graph for monorepo-scale context | AI-first code editor built on top of VS Code |
| Pricing | Free + $9/mo | Free + $20/mo |
| Categories | coding, chat, vscode-extension, jetbrains | coding, ide |
| Made by | Sourcegraph | Anysphere |
| Launched | 2023-04 | 2023-03 |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Status | active | active |
Sourcegraph Cody highlights
- + Code graph context that pulls from Sourcegraph's indexed codebase, not just open files
- + Multi-model picker: choose Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, or others per session
- + Inline completions and chat in VS Code, JetBrains, and the web UI
- + Cross-repo intelligence for understanding dependencies and shared libraries
- + Enterprise SSO, audit logs, and bring-your-own-LLM support
Cursor highlights
- + Inline AI completions with project-wide context
- + Composer mode for multi-file edits from a single prompt
- + Agent mode for autonomous task execution
- + Tab completion that learns your patterns
- + Built-in chat with codebase indexing
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
Neither is universally better. Sourcegraph Cody (Free + $9/mo) leans into coding, while Cursor (Free + $20/mo) is closer to coding. Pick based on which workflow you actually do every day.
What is the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor?
Sourcegraph Cody is free + $9/mo. Cursor is free + $20/mo. See the pricing row in the comparison table.
Can I use Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor together?
In most cases, yes. They serve overlapping but distinct needs, so running them side by side is common until you decide which fits your workflow.